All posts by Martyn Daniel

City Prepares to Seize Willet’s Point Properties – Following URA Guidelines?

Willet's Point RedevelopmentA February 11th, 2011 article in The Epoch Times entitled, City Prepares to Seize Willet’s Point Properties,  reported on 9 Queens, NY business owners who gathered at a press conference expressing concern that their properties would be taken by the City to make way for the Willet’s Point Redevelopment Project.

“The eminent domain law gives the city the power to force owners into selling private land to the city for public use. Property owners will not be left completely in the lurch, however, as they will be compensated with a fair market value determined by a judge. The EDC has also provided career training and relocation to some owners who have willingly sold their properties.

The crux of the matter remains whether the redevelopment of Willets Point is in the interest of the public, as mandated by the eminent domain law.

The city plans to replace the mishmash of auto recycling and repair shops with housing developments, retailspace, a hotel, and parkland.”

I find it very interesting that relocation benefits are only being offered to the cooperative property owners.  Most public projects using eminent domain will offer relocation benefits by following the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (URA).

The URA provides relocation benefits and guidelines to all eligible property owners and tenants within the public project’s area and makes no distinction between those that are cooperative and non-cooperative.  Those guidelines, in part, spell out how both sides will address relocation costs and the rights and responsibilities of each side.

Businesses can successfully relocate and have actually improved their businesses when relocating under these guidelines.  Without them, a business is left with incurring significant relocation costs which they often cannot afford.  Many would say this is an unfair burden to put onto a business owner while the general public is benefiting from their losses.  That’s why these URA guidelines where developed in 1970.

Having helped several hundred businesses relocate from projects using eminent domain, my experience has revealed that the public agencies that follow the URA have had better success with clearing their needed right of way in a timely and equitable fashion for all.

It would be interesting to see if the Economic Development Corp. would find more cooperation and improved success for their project if they adopted these relocation guidelines.

UPC Windfarm Prattsburgh Eminent Domain #3


When a Board member asked, what quantity of electricity can be expected to be generated and go into the grid; no total amount was provided. UPC has had six years to secure easement for transmission lines. If they are unable to buy these rights from property owners, they seem determined to rely upon state force to compel objecting land owners to give up their property rights. No meaningful benefit to the community, region or society has ever been documented or proven.

RTD, Property Rights, and Eminent Domain Abuse, part 2


Is there any recourse for property owners caught in the path of FasTracks? Property rights attorney Robert Hoban, Jessica Corry of the Independence Institute, and the owners of Pro-Tint Windows Kim Snyder and Galen Foster join Jon Caldara to detail RTDs handling of property owners and abuse of eminent domain. Tune in this Friday night at 8:30 pm to KBDI Channel 12, Fridays; repeated the following Tuesday at 5 pm.

Foxnews Eminent Domain’s Back Door


The city of Montgomery, the cradle of the civil rights movement, may be in violation of Alabama’s eminent domain law which is one of the most restrictive in the country. Often without adequate notice, it is demolishing the homes of property owners without compensation or due process. Typically, it then bills the property owners for the costs of demolition. Many of the demolished homes are in heavily minority neighborhoods. Although the city alleges that the homes are “blighted,” the case of Jimmy McCall, who is profiled in the video, contradict these claims. According to photos (not shown in the video) and a structural engineer, McCall’s new home, which he built himself, was in excellent shape. Although McCall won several court cases upholding his rights, the city demolished his home and has refused compensation. Click on the following link to view the video form the Alabama Civil Rights Advisory Commission hearing held in Montgomery, Alabama April 29th, 2009.

Eminent Domain – LIVE Conversation Portraits


EMINENT DOMAIN: THE AMERICAN DREAM ON SALE,” LIVE from the NYPL Conversation Portrait, illustrated by artist Flash Rosenberg and edited by Sarah Lohman, June 18, 2008. What is the American Dream? Does it mean having a better life by creating a home and a community, living together for generations, building and tending relationships to one another and to a place? Or do we create a “better life” by moving up, moving out, removing the old, replacing with the new? Between 1949 and 1973, urban renewal, a program of the US government, bulldozed 2500 neighborhoods in 993 American cities and dispossessed one million people. Roots got cut, neighbors and families became separated, languages and cultures were destroyed, and social bonds were broken. Marshall Berman, Professor of Political Science, City College and the Graduate Center; Mindy Fullilove, Professor of Clinical Psychiatry and Public Health at Columbia University; Tom Angotti, Professor of Urban Affairs & Planning at Hunter College; and Brian Berger, photographer/blogger, discuss the use of eminent domain and how urban renewal is changing the cityscape of New York City. Filmmaker Michael Galinsky moderates.